Pronóstico: World Cup Group C Winner

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

The 2026 FIFA World Cup Group C stage has concluded, with Brazil and Morocco advancing to the Round of 32 after a tightly contested tournament featuring Brazil, Morocco, Haiti, and Scotland. Brazil and Morocco both finished with identical records of one win and one draw, but Brazil secured the group title through superior goal difference, having scored two goals while conceding none across their matches, whereas Morocco conceded one. Haiti was eliminated early after two losses, and Scotland finished third with one win but failed to advance as a top third-placed team.

Historically, when two teams in a World Cup group finish with identical points and goal differences, the tiebreak proceeds to goals scored, then head-to-head results, and finally disciplinary points. In this case, Brazil’s clean-sheet advantage and two-goal tally over Morocco’s one-goal conceded and one-goal scored created a decisive margin, mirroring past scenarios like the 2014 Group H where Belgium edged Russia on goal difference. The current 0% probability for any other winner reflects the finality of the group stage and FIFA’s official confirmation that Brazil is the sole group winner.

Traders should monitor the official FIFA Round of 32 draw announcement, scheduled for June 26, to confirm Brazil’s knockout path and assess any potential squad rotation or injury updates that could affect their performance. Recent reports from FIFA confirm Brazil’s full squad availability with no suspensions or injuries reported post-group stage, reinforcing their status as the group champion [5]. With the settlement window ending on June 27, 2026, and no possibility of group-stage cancellation or postponement, the market resolution is now fixed on Brazil as the winner.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.