Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Mundial 2026 Grupos) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
0% | 100% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
0% | 100% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| New England Revolution (-1.5) | 0% |
| Toronto FC (-1.5) | 0% |
| New England Revolution (-2.5) | 0% |
| Toronto FC (-2.5) | 0% |
| O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| O/U 3.5 | 0% |
| O/U 4.5 | 0% |
| O/U 5.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| New England Revolution O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| New England Revolution O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| New England Revolution O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Toronto FC O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| Toronto FC O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Toronto FC O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| New England Revolution 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| New England Revolution 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Toronto FC 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| Toronto FC 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| New England Revolution 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| New England Revolution 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Toronto FC 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| Toronto FC 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
Market context
New England Revolution and Toronto FC met in MLS on 22 July, with the market sitting at **0% YES** for the “More Markets” question despite the fixture itself carrying normal single-match volatility. That kind of price usually implies the settlement condition is tied to a secondary event that has not materialised in the available record, rather than simply the result of the game. The underlying match context matters because these sides have not been a reliable source of high-scoring chaos against each other: New England beat Toronto 2-0 in May 2025, while the September 2025 meeting finished 1-1, which points to a fairly mixed but often controlled head-to-head pattern.[5][3]
For traders, the key catalyst is the post-match event chain around line-ups, substitutions, and any market-specific threshold, not the scoreline alone. Publicly available live listings show the game had already finished with New England on 8-2-5 and 26 points at the time of the ESPN feed, and Flashscore’s live page was projecting at least three total goals, indicating the match state was active enough for derivative markets to move on in-game developments.[2][1] Fox Sports’ boxscore pricing also showed New England as a modest favourite and the total set at 2.5 goals, which is consistent with a market that can swing quickly if either side rotates heavily, loses a starter late, or produces an unusually open second half.[4]
What most directly moves this specific market is whether the listed “more markets” trigger was actually offered, suspended, or left unfilled after team news, since the 0% YES price suggests traders saw little or no pathway to settlement. In practical terms, the final team sheets, any late injury scratches, and whether the MLS schedule forced either club to protect minutes for upcoming fixtures are the most relevant checks, because those factors can suppress secondary betting activity even when the match itself looks ordinary.
Methodology
Football-specific comparison page for Pronóstico: New England Revolution vs. Toronto FC - More Markets. Polymarket's live quote (Polygon order book) plus platform attributes for the three reference venues. Sports markets reward liquidity — Polymarket and Betfair are materially deeper than Kalshi (US-focused) or Manifold (play-money).
Resolution & payout
Sports markets typically settle on official final-whistle plus league confirmation. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle with a source URL per contract — usually official league data feeds or ESPN/Soccerway. Two-hour dispute window, then smart-contract payout in USDC.
FAQ
- When do sports markets resolve?
- Typically within hours of the official final whistle. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle with source URLs pointing at official league data feeds — e.g. the Premier League for EPL markets, UEFA for Champions League, FIFA for World Cup.
- Can I bet on individual matches?
- Yes, Polymarket lists every major Premier League / Champions League / World Cup match as its own market. Liquidity varies — top matches like El Clásico or a semi-final often have six-figure pools, lower-league games closer to three-figure.
- What are live sports odds on Polymarket?
- Some top-tier matches stay open during play — you can trade the half-time probability in the 70th minute. Polymarket mid-prices update second-by-second; any frontend mirroring the order book shows the same movement.
- How fast do sports winnings settle?
- Once the official league outcome is logged in the UMA Oracle (typically 1-2 hours after the final whistle), Polymarket's smart contract triggers USDC payout. To your wallet within minutes.
- What's the difference between match odds and outright odds?
- Match odds cover a single game ("Bayern beats BVB"). Outright odds are long-term aggregates ("Bayern wins the league"). Outright markets have deeper liquidity; match markets have faster resolution.
Trade Pronóstico: New England Revolution vs. Toronto FC - … on Mundial 2026 Grupos
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →